Pennsylvania Bike Laws
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA CYCLING LAWS
Laws and regulations governing the rights and responsibilities of cyclists may be challenging at times to interpret and understand. In some circumstances, there are conflicting rules between city and state levels. It’s also important to know that police officers may have varied knowledge of cycling rules and may interpret these rules incorrectly at the scene of a crash. As a cyclist in Pennsylvania, you should become familiar with some key laws – which may help to prevent a future crash. However, knowing your rights does not mean that you should engage in verbal arguments with auto drivers or enforcement. These clashes can lead to serious road rage and bodily injury. If a driver violates your rights, take a photo of the license plate and follow up immediately with a police officer and/or Bike Law PA.
SOURCE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA LAWS
The information below comes from the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, Title 75, Vehicles, which is also known as “The Vehicle Code.” There are several relevant chapters within the Code noted below, including Chapter 31 “General Provisions;” Chapter 33 “Rules of the Road;” Chapter 35 “Special Vehicles & Pedestrians;” Chapter 37 “Miscellaneous Provisions;” and Chapter 39 Driving after Drinking/Using. Below, we highlight several key laws in the state of Pennsylvania. Please note that this list is not comprehensive.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Laws – Key Laws from Title 75
Highlight from Chapter 1: General Provisions
1. Vehicle and Bicycle Definitions
In Pennsylvania bicycles are considered vehicles according to the statute that defines vehicles and pedalcycles noted below:
Vehicle Definition: “Every device in, upon or by which any person of property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway…”
Pedacycle Definition: “A vehicle propelled solely by human-powered pedal or a pedalcyle with electric assist.”
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §102 (2016)
Highlights from Chapter 33: Rules of the Road
1. Where to Ride – the Right Side of the Road
Pennsylvania requires that a bicyclist, traveling at a speed less than the speed of traffic, “shall be driven in the right-hand lane then available for traffic, or as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway”, except:
When overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction or
When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into an alley, private road or driveway.
This requirement does not apply to:
A bicycle using any portion of an available roadway due to unsafe surface conditions.
A bicycle using a roadway that has a width of not more than one lane of traffic in each direction.
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3301 (2016)
As far to the right as practicable (AFRAP) is the key phrase which seems to appear in some form or another in many state laws governing where to ride. The underlying issue with this language is that the person who interprets “practicable” may likely be different to the cyclist, auto driver and police officer. Additionally, the law allows cyclists to use “available roadway” due to “unsafe” surface conditions. Again, the question remains who may make these determinations. Colorado’s state law eliminates the confusion by granting the decision-making authority to the cyclist; their law states that a cyclist shall ride “…far enough to the right “as judged safe by the bicyclists…”
Note that the language that the requirement to stay “as far to the right as practicable” doesn’t apply where the road has a width of “not more than one lane of traffic in each direction”. It is lawful to ride in the middle of a street, for example, where there is no shoulder or where the shoulder is taken up by parking spaces.
2. Safe Passing Laws – 4-foot zone
Pennsylvania requires that the driver of a motor vehicle overtaking a bicycle traveling in the same direction “…shall pass to the left of the bicycle within not less than four feet at a careful and prudent reduced speed.”
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3303 (2016)
Pennsylvania is the ONLY state which has a four-feet passing law on the books under all circumstances. North Carolina and South Dakota include four and six feet passing laws when certain conditions are met. Pennsylvania is also one of a handful of states that specifically require the passing vehicle to REDUCE SPEED. More than half of our states have laws citing specific three foot passing zones. Unfortunately, 19 states still have Safe Passing Laws which remain unclear and poorly defined. Some examples are listed below.
North Carolina requires drivers to allow at least two feet and if in a non- passing zone, then a minimum of four feet or completely entering left lane of the highway;
South Dakota requires drivers to allow a minimum of three feet if the speed limit is 35 mph or less, and require drivers to allow a minimum of six feet when posted speed limit is greater than 35 mph;
28 States designate three feet passing laws; and
19 states designate words, such as “Due Care,” “Reasonably Clear,” “Safe Distance.” These ambiguous words create confusion on the part of both car and cyclist.
3. Turning Vehicles
Pennsylvania specifically requires vehicles turning right to not cross the path of a moving cyclist riding along the right edge of a roadway.
“No turn by a driver of a motor vehicle shall interfere with a pedalcycle proceeding straight while operating in accordance with Chapter 35 (relating to special vehicles and pedestrians).”
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3331 (2016)
Drivers almost never look in their right mirror when turning right. This section specifically protects a cyclist from a right turning vehicle.
4. Distracted Driving Laws
Pennsylvania currently has the following law aimed at distracted driving, subject to limited exception:
“No driver shall operate a motor vehicle on a roadway while using an interactive wireless communications device to send, read or write a text-based communication while the vehicle is in motion.” Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3316 (2016)
Create a Viable “Textalizer”
The real question behind a Distracted Driving law is that of enforcement; specifically, what tools are available in the field for law enforcement to assess and document whether a driver was using a cell phone prior or during a crash. In 2016, New York Senator Lieberman proposed a law known as “Evan’s Law” to create a “textalizer” tool which law enforcement may use at the scene. Bike Law PA reported on this innovative proposed law, read more here.
Change the penalties
The Pennsylvania law on Distracted Driving includes a penalty which is woefully inappropriate as either a consequence or a deterrent. The Code states that the penalty for violating this law, if convicted includes a fine of $50. The state should consider a fine of $5,000 as a penalty to distracted drivers as crash events between car and bike often result in significant bodily injuries to the cyclist.
Highlights from Chapter 35 – Special Vehicles & Pedestrians
1. Traffic laws apply to bicycles
In Pennsylvania traffic laws for vehicles apply to bicycles.
“Every person riding a bicycle upon a roadway shall be granted all of the rights and shall be subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle by this title, except as to special provisions…” This includes the requirement to signal turns by hand, including stopping. (3335-3336).
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3501 (2016)
2. Legally riding a bicycle on the roadways and bike paths
This section states that bikes may be ridden on a shoulder of a highway, traveling in the same direction as traffic. It also allows for not more than two riders abreast except on bike paths or roads set aside for bikes.
“A pedalcycle may be operated on the shoulder of a highway and shall be operated in the same direction as required of vehicles operated on the roadway. All turns shall be made in accordance with section 3331 (relating to required position and method of turning.”
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3505 (a) (2016)
“Persons riding pedalcycles upon a roadway shall not ride more than two abreast except on paths or parts of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of pedalcycles.”
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3505 (e) (2016)
The requirement for a cyclist to use available bicycle lanes/paths was removed from the statutes in 1998. However, we do encourage use of designated bike lanes/paths for safety.
According to The Code in Pennsylvania, when cyclists are riding between sunset and sunrise, they must use lighting on their bike to make themselves visible. Specifically:
“Every pedalcycle when in use between sunset and sunrise shall be equipped on the front with a lamp which emits a beam of white light intended to illuminate the pedalcycle operator’s path from a distance of at least 500 feet to the front, a red reflector facing to the rear which shall be visible at least 500 feet to the rear and an amber reflector on each side.”
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3507 (2016)
The code permits supplementation of the required front light and rear reflector with a front white flashing light and a rear red flashing light. It is noteworthy that technically having a rear red light does not eliminate the requirement of a rear reflector, although it is doubtful that this would be enforced.
4. Sidewalk Riding
Pennsylvania allows bicycles to operate on sidewalks subject to the following rules:
A person riding a bicycle upon a sidewalk or bike path used by pedestrians “…shall yield the right-of-way to any pedestrian and shall give an audible signal before overtaking and passing a pedestrian.”
A person shall not ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk in a business district unless permitted by official traffic-control devices, or when a usable bike-only lane is available adjacent to the sidewalk.
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3508 (2016)
5. Helmet Law & Civil Actions
Pennsylvania requires that any person under the age of 12 riding a bicycle, as an operator or passenger, must wear a protective bicycle helmet.
However, in no event shall the failure to wear a required helmet be used as evidence in a trial of any civil action; nor shall any jury in a civil action be instructed regarding violations of the law requiring helmets; nor shall failure to use a helmet be considered as contributory negligence.
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3510 (2016)
California, Delaware and New Mexico are the most progressive states in this area as their laws require helmets for cyclist’s younger than 18. New Jersey is a close second, requiring helmets for cyclists under 17. Twelve other states put the required helmet age at under 16, while seven states place the age between 12 and 15. 28 states are completely silent on the issue of helmets.
To see where your state stacks up against others in helmet, look here.
We strongly encourage the use of a helmet because of its ability to prevent serious head injuries if you are involved in a bicycle crash.
Pennsylvania restricts the use of e-bikes to those over 16.
Source: 75 Pa.C.S. § 3514 (2016)
7. Headphones/earbuds prohibited
Section 3314 of the vehicle code specifically prohibits the use of headphones by vehicle operators. This has been held by caselaw to apply to a motorcyclist wearing earbuds under his helmet. The above quoted section making all laws applicable to drivers of vehicles applicable to cyclists means that the common practice of riding with earbuds is technically illegal in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Highlights from Chapter 37 – Miscellaneous Provisions
Pennsylvania requires that “No person open any door on a motor vehicle unless and until it is reasonably safe to do so and can be done without interfering with the movement of other traffic…” In addition, no person shall leave a door open on a side of a vehicle available to moving traffic for a period- of- time longer than necessary to load or unload passengers.
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3705 (2016)
Promote the “Dutch Reach”
In addition to a state’s Dooring Law, we should consider adopting a driving practice which can become a mandatory part of our driving education system. That’s what the Dutch did in creating the “Dutch Reach." The practice forces the driver (or passenger) to pivot their body towards the street—which automatically points their vision to where an oncoming bicycle may be coming. This practice would address and reduce the root cause of most door injuries: the motorist's failure to check behind them before exiting their vehicle towards the street. Bike Law PA discussed the merits of the Dutch practice in the article here.
Highlights from Chapter 38 Driving Under the Influence
Bicycling Under the Influence
As we all know as motor vehicle drivers, Pennsylvania's Vehicle Code prohibits driving vehicles while intoxicated or after using controlled substances. The Code also states that bicycles are defined as vehicles and therefore this same law is applied to bicyclists. Bicycles should not be operated while the rider is under the influence of alcohol or other controlled substances.
Source: 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. §3802 (2016)
More Resources on PA State Cycling Laws
Bike Law University is an online resource developed by the Bicycle League of America which provides side by side comparisons of how each state lines up on several key cycling related laws. This comparative format is particularly helpful to advocacy groups and advocates looking to improve their state’s position on a particular- law, by pointing to other more progressive states. You can visit their page here.
Also from Penn DOT is a publication called “Pennsylvania Bicycle Driver’s Manual”. The copyright on this publication is 1988. It can be found here.
Joe is an exceptional attorney and helped me through the difficult period of time after my accident. He's a great communicator, and thorough in his approach, and I felt involved during the entire process.Andrew Y
I must have been passed by 50 other riders going the other way, and attorney Piscitello and his son very kindly stopped and helped me, giving me a new tube, and using his CO2 cartridges to get me going again, and I was able to complete the ride. I believePeter W.
For over 20 years Piscitello Law has provided the absolute best legal services to my family and friends. And, when I was injured in an auto accident, Joey got me the money that I deserved.Quintin Smith
Joe and the team at Piscitello Law were excellent at providing guidance and reassurance throughout the whole process after being involved in a car versus bicycle incident. Joe was always available whenever I needed to talk to him about the case and was alwDr. Patrick Brown
Joe & his team explained the entire process with me, answered all of my questions, & helped me get through a tough process.Christopher Z.
After two years with another attorney who was spinning wheels, Joe was recommended to me by a friend. He took over my case and successfully resolved it within approximately 6 mos.Linda B.
Even though money itself cannot entirely erase a lifetime of physical and emotional ramifications of a traumatic event, it does provide some comfort that expenses are taken care of. More than that, Joe is a gem of a man. Truly: trustworthy, dedicated, knowEve F.
Joe cares about your personal well-being and also does everything in his power to secure you a fair and agreeable settlement. His office is quick and open with their communication and guidance.Jason J
$1,100,000 Pedestrian Matter
$535,000 Bicycle Crash with Rideshare Company
$200,000 Bicycle Crash - Hit & Run
Motorist runs stop sign, hits a cyclist, and flees.
$100,000 Bicycle Crash Left Cross
A male cyclist was injured after a vehicle crossed his path of travel and struck him.39-year-old plaintiff suffered a serious knee injury requiring surgery and time off work.
Confidential settlement Bicycle Crash Right Hook
The matter involved a major international trucking company who claimed cyclists had no right to proceed on a Philadelphia Center City street. The truck driver cut the cyclist off as both vehicles executed the right turn.